Participatory Governance Strategy in Strengthening the Performance Transparency of Modern Bureaucracy

I Wayan Gede Suacana; Bernadetta Tjandra Wulandari; Hasnawati Hasnawati

doi:10.55927/fjmr.v5i3.24

Authors

I Wayan Gede Suacana Universitas Warmadewa
Bernadetta Tjandra Wulandari Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
Hasnawati Hasnawati Universitas Cahaya Prima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v5i3.24

Keywords:

Participatory Governance, Performance Transparency, Modern Bureaucracy, Public Accountability, Bureaucratic Reform

Abstract

Modern bureaucratic reform demands strengthening performance transparency as a prerequisite for public accountability, but participatory governance practices at the local government level still face structural and cultural challenges that affect the effectiveness of information disclosure. This research aims to analyze participatory governance strategies in strengthening the transparency of modern bureaucratic performance and identify implementing mechanisms that support public accountability. The research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design in one of the local governments in Papua Province. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with 10 key informants consisting of bureaucratic elements and community representatives, complemented by analysis of performance documents and limited observations. Data analysis is carried out interactively through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing using source triangulation techniques. The results of the study show that an effective participatory governance strategy is supported by the integration of public consultation forums, optimization of digital-based performance information systems, and strengthening the role of external supervisors in the policy evaluation process. Deliberative participation has been shown to improve information accessibility, clarify performance indicators, and strengthen social surveillance mechanisms.

References

Asimakopoulos, G., Antonopoulou, H., Giotopoulos, K., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Impact of information and communication technologies on democratic processes and citizen participation. Societies, 15(2), 40.

Aslam, T., & Ahmed, Z. (2024). The Relationship Between Transparency Policies and Public Trust. Social Trends and Policy Review, 2(2), 35–67.

Burcea, A. A. (2022). Digital Governance in Local Public Administration: Between Transparency and Hypercontrol.

Dai, J., & Azhar, A. (2024). Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development. Public Administration and Development, 44(4), 358–380.

Frimawan, F., & Andini, A. (2026). Bureaucratic Reform as a Strategy to Improve the Quality of Governance: A Study of Policy Processes and Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research, 1(1), 50–66.

Hartutik, D., Handoko, V. R., & Sadono, T. P. (2026). Digital Transformation of Public Service Malls: Enhancing Efficiency and Accessibility in the Digital Era. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 5(1), 393–406.

Lee, S. (2022). When tensions become opportunities: Managing accountability demands in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 641–655.

Mamabolo, M. N. (2022). The effectiveness of participatory governance in budgetary monitoring and evaluation in an information age: a case of Fetakgomo-Tubatse Local Municipality.

Mappisabbi, F., & Yappi, S. (2024). Strengthening transparency and accountability in bureaucracy to enhance public trust. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management, 1(4), 101–112.

Marlina, E., Purwaningsih, M., Al Hakim, S., & Maryati, I. (2025). Ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research: The role of triangulation techniques. In Qualitative research methods for dissertation research (pp. 347–376). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Marquardt, J., & Bäckstrand, K. (2022). Democracy Beyond the State Non-state actors and the legitimacy of climate governance. In The Routledge Handbook of Democracy and Sustainability (pp. 237–253). Routledge.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. sage.

Moussa, E. F., Porto-Gómez, I., & Campos, J. A. (2026). The dynamics of collaborative governance: a life cycle perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 1–23.

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2024). Demystification and actualisation of data saturation in qualitative research through thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241229776.

Nederhand, J., & Edelenbos, J. (2023). Legitimate public participation: AQ methodology on the views of politicians. Public Administration Review, 83(3), 522–536.

Palumbo, R. (2023). Participatory governance. In Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 9168–9172). Springer.

Schwoerer, K. (2022). Whose open data is it anyway? An exploratory study of open government data relevance and implications for democratic inclusion. Information Polity, 27(4), 491–515.

Viera, C. A. (2023). Case study as a qualitative research methodology. Performance Improvement Journal, 62(4), 125–129.

Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., & de Jong, J. (2025). Performance management in collaborative governance: a review of the literature and synthesis of the challenges. Public Performance & Management Review, 48(4), 735–767.

Wang, Q., & Guan, Z. (2023). Can sunlight disperse mistrust? A meta-analysis of the effect of transparency on citizens’ trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(3), 453–467.

Yanuarisa, Y., Irianto, G., Djamhuri, A., & Rusydi, M. K. (2025). Exploring the internal audit of public procurement governance: a systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2485411.