Institutional Leadership Practices for Digital Transformation in Selected Private Higher Education Institutions in the National Capital Region

Roel Balayan; Meileen Joy Abad; Niño Angelo Austria; Stephanie Salcedo

doi:10.55927/fjmr.v5i10.223

Authors

Roel Balayan La Consolacion University Philippines
Meileen Joy Abad La Consolacion University Philippines
Niño Angelo Austria La Consolacion University Philippines
Stephanie Salcedo La Consolacion University Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v5i10.223

Keywords:

Institutional Leadership, Digital Transformation, Private Higher Education Institutions, Faculty Development, Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods

Abstract

This study examined six dimensions of institutional leadership for digital transformation in eight private higher education institutions in the National Capital Region, Philippines. Conducted from November 2025 to February 2026, the study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design involving surveys of 329 faculty members and qualitative follow-up with eight administrators and 12 faculty members. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and thematic analysis. Infrastructure received the highest rating, while professional development received the lowest. No statistically significant differences were detected across institutions. Qualitative accounts highlighted technological investments, limited continuing training, and the development of data practices. Findings indicated a perceived imbalance between technological provision and sustained faculty support, underscoring the need for discipline-specific professional development.

References

Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. (2021). Digital leader and transformational leadership in higher education. In INTED2021 proceedings (pp. 9616–9624). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2021.2005

Barrot, J. S., Agdeppa, J. Y., & Manzano, B. A. (2024). What it takes to teach in a fully online learning environment: Provisional views from a developing country. Online Learning, 28(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3921

Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410

Borup, J., & Evmenova, A. S. (2019). The effectiveness of professional development in overcoming obstacles to effective online instruction in a college of education. Online Learning, 23(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1468

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Castro Benavides, L. M., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), Article 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Duterte, J. P. (2025). Exploring the Lasallian digital leaders’ journeys in the new normal: Basis for leadership framework development [Doctoral dissertation, De La Salle University]. Animo Repository. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdd_elmd/35/

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6, Pt. 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004