Beyond the Command Table: Socio-Ecological Collaborative Governance for Flood Disaster Management in Berau Regency, Indonesia

Authors

  • Yusup Gunawan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • V. Rudy Handoko Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Achluddin Ibnu Rochim Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v5i9.211

Keywords:

Collaborative Governance, Flood Disaster Management, New Public Service, Customary Knowledge, NVivo

Abstract

Floods in Berau Regency, East Kalimantan, have changed from seasonal events into a persistent and largely human-induced crisis, while the local government’s response capacity remains far below the scale of exposure. This study examines how collaborative governance operates in flood disaster management in Berau, identifies the factors that hinder and support it, and formulates a design for a more suitable governance model. A constructivist qualitative approach with a single case study design was used. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with key informants from government, the regional disaster management agency (BPBD), the military and police, affected residents, the Dayak customary community, a coal company, non-governmental organizations, and the media, complemented by field observation and document analysis. The data were coded in NVivo using the four dimensions of Ansell and Gash (2008). The findings show that collaboration was driven by resource scarcity rather than by shared trust: BPBD had only 10 permanent rapid-response personnel and 19 boats for about 38,788 people at risk. The multisector command system was formalized through a contingency plan and a regent’s decree, yet it did not include customary leaders, NGOs, and independent media. The response was sustained by frontline territorial officers, private-sector logistics, analog radio volunteers, and village-level resilience groups. The study proposes a Socio-Ecological Collaborative Governance model that rests on spatial and ecological justice, decentralized customary authority, distributed field leadership, and cross-medium communication.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2025). [Disaster events data for Indonesia, 2024] [Data set]. BNPB.

Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Kabupaten Berau. (2025). [Flood events, impacts, and losses in Berau Regency, 2023 and 2025] [Unpublished raw data]. BPBD Kabupaten Berau.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Berau. (2025). [Area, population density, and regional gross domestic product of Berau Regency] [Statistical data]. BPS Kabupaten Berau.

Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), Article eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (4th ed.). Routledge.

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Global Forest Watch. (2024). [Tree cover loss in Berau Regency, 2000–2022] [Data set]. World Resources Institute.

Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601

Jaringan Advokasi Tambang Kalimantan Timur. (2024). [Mining concessions in Berau Regency and their spatial relation to flood locations]. JATAM Kaltim.

Kapucu, N., Arslan, T., & Collins, M. L. (2010). Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: Toward a network-centered approach. Administration & Society, 42(2), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710362517

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

McGuire, M., & Silvia, C. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: Evidence from local emergency management. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02134.x

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pemerintah Kabupaten Berau. (2025). [Budget allocation for flood response and drainage, fiscal year 2025]. Pemerintah Kabupaten Berau.

Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Berau Nomor 8 Tahun 2022 tentang Penyelenggaraan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah.

Republik Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana.

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

World Meteorological Organization. (2024). State of the global climate 2023 (WMO-No. 1347). WMO.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Published

2026-09-30