Identification Factors Affecting Corporate Sustainability in the Primary Consumer Goods Sector on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, 2020-2024

Authors

  • Dodi Areadi Universitas Jambi
  • Mukhzarudfa Mukhzarudfa Universitas Jambi
  • Ratih Kusumastuti Universitas Jambi
  • Wiwik Tiswiyanti Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v5i4.59

Keywords:

Corporate Sustainability, ESG, Content Analysis, Indonesia Stock Exchange, Primary Consumer Sector

Abstract

This study examined and mapped the determinants of corporate sustainability practices among companies in the primary consumer goods sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) over 2020–2024. Employing descriptive qualitative content analysis on 105 documents from 21 purposively selected companies, the study identified five sustainability pillars: innovation capacity, corporate governance, environmental management, corporate social responsibility, and human capital investment. Empirical findings reveal that corporate sustainability is shaped by the synergy of all five pillars, with notable implementation variation across sub-sectors, indicating the sustainability agenda has evolved into a strategic business pillar transcending mere regulatory compliance.

References

Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 483–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2015.1012097

Al-Shaer, H. (2020). Sustainability reporting quality and investment efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(4), 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4035-2

Bansal, P., & Song, H. C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095

Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2015). CSR disclosure: The more things change...? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1311

Crane, A., Henriques, I., Husted, B. W., & Matten, D. (2017). Measuring corporate social responsibility and impact. Business & Society, 56(6), 787–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317719261

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852

Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101889

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI standards 2021.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/256741

International Integrated Reporting Council. (2013). The international integrated reporting framework.

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.19

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate governance and carbon performance. Accounting & Finance, 61(2), 2891–2934. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12686

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. SSOAR.

Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018

Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Peraturan OJK Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi LJK, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2019). Analyzing media messages (4th ed.). Routledge.

Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4–8.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Tilt, C. A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility research: The importance of context. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0003-7

Wahyuningsih, S., & Mahendra, A. (2020). Compliance-oriented sustainability reporting in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Management, 18(2), 55–72.

Published

2026-04-29

Issue

Section

Articles